Corporate Reputation During Economic Crisis and Its Relationship With Financial Performance: A Conceptual Model for Asean Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/proyeksi.v21i01.1397Keywords:
Corporate Reputation, Financial Performance, ASEAN Companies,Abstract
Corporate reputation is a growing issue for academics and practitioners. With globalization, such tactics are used especially in Western countries yet there are obvious lack of studies on corporate reputation measurement and the relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance in ASEAN companies. The literature concentrates on the US and European companies, especially on how the public rate companies, what are rating of companies, and what relationship occurs between corporate reputation and financial performance. Corporate reputation measurement during economic crisis and its relationship with financial performance in ASEAN is detailed in the model proposed.
Keywords:
Corporate Reputation, Financial Performance, ASEAN Companies,
*This article has been presented in the international conference organized by the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Tanjungpura University joint by ASAIHL on the Dies Natalis Untan to-50.
References
Black, E. L., Carnes, T. A., & Richardson, V. J. (2000). The market valuation of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(1), 31-42.
Chung, S. Y., Schneeweis, T., & Eneroth, K. (1999). Corporate reputation and investment performance:The uk and uk expertise. SSRN Electronic Paper Collection.
Corderio, J. J., & Shambharya, R. B. (1997). Do corporate reputations influence security analyst earning forecast? An empirical study. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1,2), 94-97.
Deephouse, D. L. (1997). The effect of financial and media reputation on performance. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1,2), 68-71.
Dowling, G. R. (1994). Corporate reputations: Strategies for developing the corporate brand (First Edition ed.). Melbourne: Longman Professional Publishing.
Dunbar, R. L. M., & Schwalbach, J. (2000). Corporate reputation and performance in germany. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(2), 115-123.
Fombrun, C. J. (2001). Corporate reputation - its measurement and management. Thexis, 4, 23-26.
Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. (2000). The reputation quotient: A multi- stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241-255.
Fombrun, C. J., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
Gabbioneta, C., Ravasi, D., & Mazzola, P. (2007). Exploring the drivers of corporate reputation: A study of italian securities analyst. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(2), 99-123.
Gardberg, N. A. (2006). Reputatie, reputation, reputation, reputazione, ruf: A cross- cultural qualitative analysis of construct and instrument equivalence. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 39-61.
Gilley, K. M., & Rasheed, A. (2000). Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance. Journal of Management, 26(4), 763-790.
Hair, J, F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R., E., Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (Six Edition ed.). NewYork: Prentice Hall Publishing.
Hammond, S. A., & Slocum, J. W. (1996). The impact of prior firm financial performance on subsequent corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 159-165.
Jones, G., Jones, B., & Little, P. (2000). Reputation as a reservoir: Buffering against loss in times of economic crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(1), 21-29.
Loehlin, J.C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McGuire, J. B., Schneeweis, T., & Branch, B. (1990). Perception of firm quality: A cause or result of firm performance. Journal of Management, 16(1), 167-180.
Perry, C. (1998). Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 785-802.
Preston, L. E., & Sapienza, H. (1990). Stakeholder management and corporate performance. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 361-375.
Riahi-Belkaoui, A., & Pavlik, E. (1991). Asset management performance and reputation building for large us firms. British Journal of Management, 2, 231-238.
Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (1997). The value of a firm's corporate reputation: How reputation helps attain and sustain superior profitability. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1-2), 72-76.
Roth, K. (1992). International configuration and coordination archetypes for medium- sized firms in global industries. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), 533-549.
Sabate, J. M. F., & Puente, E. Q. (2003). Empirical analysis of the relationship between corporate reputation and financial performance: A survey of literature. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(2), 161-177.
Samuels, J. M., Wilkes, F. M., & Brayshaw, R. E. (1999). Financial management & decision making. London: International Thomson Business Press.
Sanchez, A. M., Jimenez, M. J. V., Carnicer, P. d. L., & Perez, M. P. (2007). Managerial perceptions of workplace flexibility and firm performance. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 27(7), 714-734.
Schwaiger, M. (2004). Component and parameter of corporate reputation: An empirical study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56, 46-71
Schultz, M., Mouritsen, J., Gabrielsen, G., & Ramussen, J. (2001). Sticky reputation: Analyzing a ranking system. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), 26-41.
Sobol, M. G., & Farelly, G. (1988). Corporate reputation: A function of relative size or financial performance. Review of Business and Economics Research, 24, 45-49.
Srivastava, R. K., McIrish, T. H., Wood, R. A., & Capraro, A. J. (1997). The value of corporate reputation: Evidence from equity markets. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1-2), 62-68
Vergin, R. C., & Qoronfleh, M. W. (1998). Corporate reputation and the stock market.
Business Horizons, January-February, 19-26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- Author give access rights to a user and share this article voluntarily to the interests of the development of science and is a non-profit
- All things related to the contents of this article is fully become my responsibility as the author of the issuer not responsible for some or all of the article mentioned.
- This article is the original research results and or my thoughts, has never been published on any publication system both printed and vote electronically and does not contain elements of plagiat
